We need to find new ways to fund arts and culture. We cannot rely on what has been there before, institutions do crumble over time, things do change and whilst I, personally, don't agree with a policy being discussed or enacted by the current government and think that we should fight, question and argue each and every one of them, I also believe this is an opportunity to try other things.
Crowdfunding is a way to go, in fact on the (now many) crowdfunding sites out there, you can find a number of art projects, short films, gallery shows etc. WeDidThis is dedicated to crowdfunding art.
Before now I've proposed ideas around how we could look at funding journalism if we want to avoid the possible agendas of media moguls. Now, let's think about the cultural space around us.
We are already crowdfunding art works:
In Oxford, the city council has started running Create, a project where, once a month, artists submit proposals, from which six are selected to pitch at an event. The event is open to the public, attendees are asked for a suggested donation of £10 (or a minimum of £5) which goes into the event pot. The council match the donations in the pot. At the event, the artists pitch and everyone votes for who gets the money.
The People Speak also run a similar event called Who Wants to Be…?, the audience creates a fund and then spend the event deciding what to do with the money. Designed around a game show concept as much as it is an audience participation event, this is also a performance in itself.
The Oxford model has run twice now and seems to be working, and is something that could be used elsewhere.
You could also use a model similar to the one I suggested for the news foundation, ‘I agree to pay X amount once a month into a fund.’ As a contributor to the foundation, I get to vote for the board that will be in charge of the dispersal of grants from the fund. In this model, I would have less say over what specific art, events etc. would get funded; instead, I devolve that to a curatorial board. This could be seen as similar to the Awesome Foundation.
Now in the Arts UnCouncil, we look at the board showing the balance available to fund the arts; and at first glance it is bare.
Then we notice in the corner, Oxford City Council’s Create is there. Other projects, such as the Nesta-backed National Funding Scheme are currently on trial (disclosure: there is some of my code and technical architecture in the NFS project) but also fall into our field of view — yet there are still lots of blank spaces.
These are the spaces that we can fill, The Arts UnCouncil is the collective effort of us all to take part in the cultural landscape of our society. It is not a replacement for the Arts Council but is an as well as. We are not looking to close the funding gap but to participate in the creation of culture and art.
Very quickly, the spaces on the grid fill up. You read some of the titles, some really catch your interest, others you glance over but that's okay. An idea springs into your mind, how you want to talk about something that has been in your head for a while, an idea or project you've been working on over time. You want to share and listen. So you grab a pen and fill in one of the spaces.
This is just a note to ask us to start talking about how we might all actively contribute to our cultural landscape, how we might allow for challenging work to be developed and produced, how we can feel a part of the landscape.
The Arts UnCouncil might become a thing, run in trust for us all, or maybe it is just an idea around which we can think and talk and do.